Thread:ConTraZ VII/@comment-10543602-20130611165735/@comment-5182794-20130612134950

UserU wrote: You can start the vote, explain the reason for the change, and wait for the results. However no offence there, the majority of the voters will vote against this proposal because they are used to posting random comments, such as the "Skull-6 can be dual Barretts". If the forum is implemented, they won't be able to do that due to the regulations.

If you noticed, the popular Wikis have no comments section; Wikipedia, Half-Life and Counter-Strike. As the content integrities are maintained, the Talk Page serves as a mini-forum so that spammers and trollers can be weeded out much easier. The outlook is more professional and it won't utilize too much resources just to load the comments(if they number to over a hundred).

Take a look at this article on HL Wikia. Very clean without the comments lying about: http://half-life.wikia.com/wiki/Advisor_Pod

Disabling the comments won't affect those pages presented by default, only for the articles created.

Too many in numbers means more contributions, but also brings more mess to clean up.

If editing is restricted to admins, the contributors will have to discuss with us(Talk or forum) first before we can confirm whether are the rumors/ contents true or not. That way, it will reduce the workload to reverse those unwanted changes. Ok. But maybe better you give protection to all important pages in this wiki. Such as Weapons, Characters, Items, etc. Give protection only for ANONYMOUS (A Wikia Contributor)