Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-10543602-20141009064240/@comment-16087280-20141012121220

Athener wrote: Vampjrehunter wrote: Athener wrote: Vampjrehunter wrote: Athener wrote: Vampjrehunter wrote: Yep, but as we confirmed, we focus on what are the differences of the objects in CSO, compare to CS. Also, about his edits, i read carefully, and i agree that he writes very good. I just notice that don't need to bring everything from other CS wiki into CSO. Just focus on the differences. Not the writing language == I meant content, if you see in some weapon, our wiki just have short overview, comparison and dates + trivia, someone please extend it!!! *scream DX* Yep, but in CS wiki, we only have intro for original weapons (the classic ones). While in CSO, we have a lot. Then the only way is, we make intro ourselves, cannot copy from anyones (except Wikipedia, i think =))).

I think to expand we must allow a small amount of speculation, like describing weapon design, or structure etc, take note that comparison with real-world are prohibited No problem, totally support this. However, notice the grammars, i hate grammar mistakes, u know. Grammar Nazi detected

Yep! No mistakes are allowed! Anywhere has mistakes, i come to this place.